90 seconds in Tokyo. Four minutes in Amsterdam.
One short wrap at the end of a day in Japan. One sourced answer the next morning in the Netherlands. Nothing heroic in between — that's the whole point.
Your wrap is already 80% written.
At the end of the day, StandIn pulls what you did from GitHub, Linear, and Slack. Your commits, your closed tickets, your PRs, your code reviews. It prefills three fields.
You see the prefill, you add one line of context if something needs explaining, and you publish. 90 seconds.
What I shipped
Pulled from your actual work.
What's blocked
Pulled from your flagged tickets and your team's dependencies.
What's next
Pulled from your next-up items in Linear or Jira.
Your Representative goes live when you log off.
The moment you publish your wrap, your Personal Representative is live. It stays online until you come back. Your teammates in other time zones can ask it questions and get answers in your own words.
A real example, all the way through.
Sarah finishes her day
She opens StandIn. Her wrap is already 80% written from her GitHub and Linear activity.
She adds one sentence: "If the JWT config lands overnight, Alex can merge #482 without me."
She publishes. Her Personal Representative goes live. Laptop closed.
Sarah's Representative stays live
Her published wrap becomes her Personal Representative. For the next several hours, teammates can ask it questions and get sourced answers from what she wrote.
Alex starts his morning in Amsterdam
He asks Sarah's Representative: "Is the auth API ready to merge?"
Answer, sourced to Sarah's wrap at 17:45 JST: "Yes, PR #482 is ready. Sarah noted you can merge it if the JWT config has landed. Dave owns that."
Alex checks with Dave. Dave confirms. Alex merges. Four minutes total.
When the answer isn't there, it tells you.
Sometimes Alex asks a question Sarah didn't cover in her wrap. When that happens, Sarah's Representative doesn't guess. It says so, and points Alex to whoever would know.
This is the moment most AI tools get wrong. They fill the silence with a guess. StandIn doesn't. That's the whole point.
Why engineers adopt StandIn when they've rejected every previous tool
Most availability tools get killed by engineering teams because they feel like surveillance. StandIn was built knowing that history.
Your keystrokes are yours
No access to active hours, mouse movement, or screen activity. None of this data exists in the system.
No performance scoring
No leaderboard. No manager can query who published most consistently. Your wrap is a courtesy to your team, not a metric.
DMs are invisible
Access permissions exclude all private messages by design. If you didn't publish it in a wrap, it doesn't exist inside StandIn.
No visibility into individuals
Managers cannot query "what is Sarah doing right now?" StandIn answers about projects and blockers, not about people.
You control the record
Integrations pre-fill your draft from public work outputs. You review everything before it publishes. Nothing goes on record without your approval.
No sentiment analysis
StandIn doesn't analyze how people work, when they work, or how they feel about it. Period.